Alkin, M. C., & Coyle, K. (1988). Thoughts on evaluation utilization, misutilization, and non-utilization. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 14(3), 331–340.
Applebee, A. N. (1974). Tradition and reform in the teaching of English: A history. National Council of Teachers of English.
Barry, J. M. (2020, July 14). The pandemic could get much, much worse. We must act now. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/14/opinion/coronavirus-shutdown.html.
Boorstin, D. J. (1958). The Americans: The colonial experience. Vintage Books.Brandl, J. (1994, September 5). Must deal with the bureaucracy—but exactly how is harder to say. Minneapolis Star Tribune, 13A.
Campbell, D. T. (1975). Reforms as experiments. In E. L. Struening & M. Guttentag (Eds.), Handbook of evaluation research (Vol. 1, pp. 71–100). SAGE.
Campbell, D. T. (1991). Methods for the experimenting society. Evaluation practice, 12(3), 223–260 (Original work published 1971).
Chelimsky, E. (2006a). The purposes of evaluation in a democratic society. In I. F. Shaw, J. C. Greene & M. M. Mark (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of evaluation: Policies, programs and practices (pp. 33–55). SAGE.
Chelimsky, E. (2006b, November 3). A clash of culture: Improving the fit between evaluative independence and the political requirements of a democratic society [Conference presentation]. Presidential Strand Plenary Keynote, American Evaluation Association National Conference, Portland, OR.
Chelimsky, E. (2007). Factors influencing the choice of methods in federal evaluation practice. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 2007(113), 13–33.
Christie, C., & Alkin, M. (1999). Further reflections on evaluation misutilization. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 25(1), 1–10.
Commission on Evidence-Based Policymaking. (2017). The promise of evidence-based policymaking. Bipartisan Policy Center. https://bipartisanpolicy.org/commission-evidence-based-policymaking/.
Deitchman, S. (1976). The best-laid schemes: A tale of social research and bureaucracy. MIT Press.Deming, E. W. (1975). The logic of evaluation. In E. L. Struening & M. Guttentag (Eds.), Handbook of evaluation research (Vol. 1, pp. 53–70). SAGE.
Edison, T. (1983). The diary and observations. Philosophical Library.Foundation for Critical Thinking. (2016). A brief history of the idea of critical thinking. https://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/a-brief-history-of-the-idea-of-critical-thinking/408.
General Accounting Office (GAO). (1987). Federal evaluation: Fewer units, reduced resources. PMED-87–9.
General Accounting Office (GAO). (1992). Program evaluation issues. OCG-93–6TR.General Accounting Office (GAO). (1995). Program evaluation: Improving the flow of information to the Congress. PEMD-95–1.
Grasso, P. G. (1996). End of an era: Closing the U.S. General Accounting Office’s program evaluation and methodology division. American Journal of Evaluation, 17(2), 115–117.
Guttentag, M., & Struening, E. L. (Eds.). (1975a). Handbook of evaluation research (Vols. 1–4). SAGE.
Guttentag, M., & Struening, E. L. (1975b). The handbook: Its purpose and organization. In M. Guttentag & E. L. Struening, Handbook of evaluation research (Vol. 2, pp. 3–10). SAGE.
Guttmann, D., & Sussman, M. B. (Eds.). (1995). Exemplary social intervention programs for members and their families (Special Issues). Marriage and Family Review, 21(1, 2).
Hendricks, M., Mangano, M. F., & Moran, W. C. (Eds.). (1990). Inspectors general: A new force in evaluation (Special Issue). New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1990(48), 25–36.
Herman, J. L., & Haertel, E. H. (2005). The 104th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, part 2: Uses and misuses of data for educational accountability and improvement. Blackwell.
House, E. R. (1972). The conscience of educational evaluation. Teachers College Record, 73(3), 405–414.
House, E. R. (1990). Trends in evaluation. Educational Researcher, 19(3), 24–28.Julnes, G., & Rog, D. (Eds.). (2007). Informing federal policies on evaluation methodology: Building the evidence base for method choice in government sponsored evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 2007(113) (J–B PE Single Issue [Program] Evaluation).
Kennedy School of Government. (1995, November). Innovations in America Government Awards winners. Governing, 27–42.
Ko, K. H. (2017). A brief history of imperial examination and its influences. Society, 54, 272–278.McCune, S. M. (2016). Remembering Marcia Guttentag. AEA365 blog. https://aea365.org/blog/sara-miller-mccune-on-remembering-marcia-guttentag-1933-1977-pioneer-in-establishing-evaluation-as-a-distinct-field/.
Mohan, R., & Sullivan, K. (Eds.). (2007). Promoting the use of government evaluations in policymaking. New directions for Evaluation, 2007(113) (J–B PE Single Issue [Program] Evaluation).
Moynihan, D. P. (2006). Managing for results in state government: Evaluating a decade of reform. Public Administration Review, 66(1), 77–89.
Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector from schoolhouse to statehouse, city hall to the Pentagon. Addison-Wesley.
Patton, M. Q. (1978). Utilization-focused evaluation. SAGE.Patton, M. Q. (2005). Misuse of evaluations. In S. Mathison (Ed.), Encyclopedia of evaluation (pp. 254–255). SAGE.
Patton, M. Q. (2011). Developmental evaluation: Applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. The Guilford Press.
Patton, M. Q. (2020). Blue marble evaluation. The Guilford Press.Patton, M. Q. (2021). Evaluation criteria for evaluating transformation: Implications for the coronavirus pandemic and the global climate emergency. American Journal of Evaluation, 42(1), 53–89.
Patton, M. Q., & Campbell-Patton, C. E. (2022). Utilization-focused evaluation: Premises and principles (5th ed.). SAGE.
Picciotto, R. (2019). Is evaluation obsolete in a post-truth world? Evaluation and Program Planning, 73(April), 88–96.
Picheta, R. (2018, October 30). This is the “last generation” that can save nature. CNN. https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/29/health/wwf-wildlife-population-report-intl/index.html.
Revkin, A. C. (2005, June 8). Bush aide softened greenhouse gas links to global warming. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/08/politics/bush-aide-softened-greenhouse-gas-links-to-global-warming.html.
Rogers, P. J., with Winston, J. A. (2006, October). Monitoring for results-based management: Emergent approach or outdated technology? [Paper presentation]. Joint conference of the European Evaluation Society and the United Kingdom Evaluation Society, London.
Schorr, L., & Schorr, D. (1988). Within our reach: Breaking the cycle of disadvantage. Doubleday. Sears, R. (2006). The old accountability shuffle. Policy Options, 27(5), 19–27.Sechrest, L. (1994). Program evaluation: Oh what it seemed to be! Evaluation Practice, 15(3), 359–365.
Smith, D. S. (1992). Academic and staff attitudes towards program evaluation in nonformal educational systems [Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley].
Specter, M. (2006, March 13). Political science: The Bush Administration’s war on the laboratory. The New Yorker, LXXXII(4), 58–69.
Subramanian, S. (2016, November 16). “Post-truth” named Oxford Dictionaries word of the year. The National News. https://www.thenationalnews.com/world/post-truth-named-oxford-dictionaries-word-of-the-year-1.205473.
Vo, A. T., & Archibald, T. (2018). New directions for evaluative thinking. New Directions for Evaluation, 2018(158), 139–147.
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018, March 8). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146–1151.
Weiss, C. H. (1972). Evaluating educational and social action programs: A “treeful of owls.” In C. H. Weiss (Ed.), Evaluating action programs (pp. 3–27). Allyn & Bacon.
Weiss, C. H. (1975). Evaluation research in the political context. In E. L. Struening & M. Guttentag (Eds.), Handbook of evaluation research (Vol. 1, pp. 13–26). SAGE.
Weiss, C. H. (1977). Introduction. In C. H. Weiss (Ed.), Using social research in public policy making (pp. 1–22). D. C. Heath.
Weiss, C. H. (2004). Rooting for evaluation: A Cliff Notes version of my work. In M. C. Alkin (Ed.), Evaluation roots: Tracing theorists’ views and influences (pp. 153–168). SAGE.
Wholey, J. S., Scanlon, J. W., Duffy, H. G., Fukumotu, J. S., & Vogt, L. M. (1970). Federal evaluation policy: Analyzing the effects of public programs. Urban Institute.
Williams, W., & Evans, J. W. (1969). The politics of evaluation: The case of head start. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 385(1), 118–132.
Wortman, P. M. (1995). An exemplary evaluation of a program that worked: The High/Scope Perry Preschool project. Evaluation Practice, 16(3), 257–265.